6 min read · Alabama Personal Injury · Birmingham & Hoover
The AEMLD, or Alabama Extended Manufacturer's Liability Doctrine, is the framework Alabama courts use for many product liability claims. Under the AEMLD, a manufacturer or seller can be held liable for injuries caused by a product that was defective and unreasonably dangerous when it left their control. Unlike pure strict liability in some states, the AEMLD has a fault-based element, and defendants can raise certain defenses. An injured consumer generally must show the product was defective, that the defect made it unreasonably dangerous, and that it caused the injury.
When a dangerous or defective product injures someone, Alabama analyzes the claim under a doctrine with an unusual name: the Alabama Extended Manufacturer's Liability Doctrine, or AEMLD. Understanding its basics helps explain what these cases require.
This guide explains what the AEMLD is and what an injured person generally must show under it. It is educational and not a substitute for advice about your specific situation.
The AEMLD allows an injured person to pursue manufacturers and, in many cases, sellers of a product that was defective and unreasonably dangerous when it left the defendant's control. Defects can arise from the product's design, a manufacturing flaw, or inadequate warnings or instructions.
The doctrine reflects the idea that those who make and sell products bear responsibility when those products are unreasonably dangerous and cause harm, even if the injured person had no direct relationship with the manufacturer.
Although the AEMLD is sometimes compared to strict liability, Alabama's doctrine retains a fault-based component and is not identical to the pure strict liability used in some states. Defendants can raise defenses, and the analysis can be more involved than simply showing a product failed.
Common defenses can include arguments that the product was not defective, that it was misused or altered, or that the danger was open and obvious. The availability of these defenses is one reason these cases require careful development.
Generally, an AEMLD claim requires showing that the product was defective, that the defect rendered it unreasonably dangerous, that the product reached the user without substantial change, and that the defect caused the injury. Expert testimony is often needed to establish the defect and causation.
Because product cases can be technical and document-intensive, and because the product itself is often key evidence, preserving the product and acting promptly can be important. Alabama's fault rules and applicable deadlines also apply.
A Birmingham homeowner is badly burned when a space heater suddenly bursts into flames. In the cleanup, he throws the melted heater away before anyone can examine it.
An AEMLD claim requires showing the product was defective and unreasonably dangerous, and the heater itself is often the single most important piece of evidence. Discarding it can cripple an otherwise valid product-liability case, because experts may have nothing left to inspect.
This scenario is a simplified, illustrative hypothetical to explain how the law generally works. It is not a real case and is not a prediction or guarantee of any particular outcome.
Our Birmingham and Hoover personal injury attorneys handle these cases every day. Learn how we can help, or call for a free, confidential consultation. You pay no attorney fees unless we win.
This guide is provided for general educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship. It is not medical advice. Alabama law and its application depend on the specific facts of your situation and can change over time. For advice about your matter, speak with a licensed Alabama attorney.